Negative Impact of Technology Use and Multi-tasking
by Gary Lew, for EDUC5303G
(#techcurr)
Introduction:
Image courtesy of https://www.mountelizabeth.com.sg/healthplus/article/multitasking-debunked |
With mobile device use expected to
surpass the five billion mark in consumers, globally, by this year, the increase
in technology usage aligns with progressively common multi-tasking activities
on a daily basis. On any given
day, teens in the United States spend about nine hours using media/technology
for their enjoyment - watching TV, videos and movies, playing video games,
reading, listening to music and checking social media (Wallace, 2015). Students
continue to try and perform multiple tasks simultaneously, such as, texting,
browsing Facebook/Instagram/Snapchat, streaming media, “studying”, playing
online games, etc. Stenger’s (2017) study shows that technology and multi-tasking
impacts brain functioning and learning. The authors’ research shows that
learning is less flexible and more specialized when a person is multi-tasking. That
is, multi-taskers have difficulty with information retrieval and reduced long-term memory of tasks. The results
indicate that learning facts and concepts worsen if one learns them while being
distracted with technology use.
While Cherry (2019) confirms that multi-tasking seems like a great way
to get a lot accomplished, it may seem like you are getting a great deal done,
but our brains are not nearly as quick in handling multiple tasks as we would like
to think we are. Research suggests that multi-tasking can reduce productivity
by 40% when we shift from one thing to another. It is difficult to tune out
distractions, which causes a mental block. Technology use and multi-tasking
impacts brain function, making it worse to sort out relevant information from
irrelevant ones. Therefore, multitasking can
lead to over-stimulation of one’s brain function and this could adversely
increase an individual’s stress levels. The constant high stress level can
cause individuals to become more sick, missing days of work/school, and
decreasing their overall work productivity.
Furthermore, Umoh (2017) found that regular multitasking is
correlated with low emotional intelligence. In fact, multitasking while doing
cognitive tasks can decrease the IQ by 10 to 15 points and have the equivalent
effect of not sleeping the night before, thereby lowering productivity.
Image courtesy of https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/03/health/teens-tweens-media-screen-use-report/index.html |
Solutions:
So what can be done? To minimize the
negative effects of technology use and multitasking, tasks should be
prioritized and goals set for each day, week or month to ensure that
individuals know what things are important and what can wait in terms of
deadlines. Korby (2013) offers some other strategies, such as:
- working offline and disconnecting from the internet (stop checking social media and
news feeds every five minutes).
- setting limitations on technology use.
- setting aside
“family time” to reconnect with individuals……Talk to each other, have
conversations.
- making a realistic “to do” list: A to do list is great, but a list of 20 items can be
demotivating. Rather list the top five things that are most urgent. When these
are done, move on to the next.
- minimizing multitasking: Pick one thing and finish it. Don’t try and do multiple items
simultaneously, moving from one to the next every 10 minutes.
- Time
block: Dedicating certain times to certain tasks. This will help in managing your
time, and lead to tasks being completed faster and better.
d (Umoh, 2017)
Summary:
While it may be evident
from the research that multitasking while using technology has a negative
impact on productivity and brain function, to the net generation multitasker
this may be the acceptable norm. Net
Gener’s want the freedom to try new and different things that are fun, engaging
and challenging. Research suggests that
they expect to have the flexibility to choose where and when to work, and what
technology to use to integrate their home and social life with work life. Net
Gener’s are natural collaborators. They
build social online relationships and collaborations through chat groups, play
multi-user video games, texting, using social media (instant messaging), and
share files with others for school work or fun. Net Gener’s live in a world of
digital speed, so they expect everything they do to be instantaneous, 24/7,
from instant messaging responses to video gaming speed and feedback, so
multitasking with technology use comes naturally to them (Tapscott, 2009).
Korby (2013) suggests
the problem might be more complex than just teen brains being impacted by
technology interruptions. Perhaps many students aren’t being challenged and engaged enough to stimulate their brains in
class. So, the result is kids who are looking for a welcome, exciting
distraction using a variety of technology tools simultaneously. As the article indicates, we should prefer
talking to our students when they are actually in the room. We want our
students to boldly take risks. They cannot do this if they are constantly using
technology and their ideas come anonymously across an electronic device.
References:
Cherry, K. (2019, March 16). The Cognitive and Productive
Costs of Multitasking. Retrieved from
https://www.verywellmind.com/multitasking-2795003
Korby, H. (2013, May 15). With Tech Tools, How Should
Teachers Tackle Multitasking In Class? Retrieved from https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/28719/with-tech-tools-how-should-teachers-tackle-multitasking-in-class
Stenger, M. (2013, December 01). How Technology-Based
Multitasking Impacts Learning. Retrieved from https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/other/how-technology-based-multitasking-impacts-learning
Tapscott, D. (2009). The eight net gen norms. In Grown up
digital (pp.75-96). Toronto, Ontario: McGraw-Hill.
Umoh, R. (2017, October 6). With Tech Tools, How Should
Teachers Tackle Multitasking In Class? Retrieved from https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/28719/with-tech-tools-how-should-teachers-tackle-multitasking-in-class
Wallace, K. (2015, November 03). Teens spend 9 hours a day
using media, report says. Retrieved from
https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/03/health/teens-tweens-media-screen-use-report/index.html
Summary:
While it may be evident
from the research that multitasking while using technology has a negative
impact on productivity and brain function, to the net generation multitasker
this may be the acceptable norm. Net
Gener’s want the freedom to try new and different things that are fun, engaging
and challenging. Research suggests that
they expect to have the flexibility to choose where and when to work, and what
technology to use to integrate their home and social life with work life. Net
Gener’s are natural collaborators. They
build social online relationships and collaborations through chat groups, play
multi-user video games, texting, using social media (instant messaging), and
share files with others for school work or fun. Net Gener’s live in a world of
digital speed, so they expect everything they do to be instantaneous, 24/7,
from instant messaging responses to video gaming speed and feedback, so
multitasking with technology use comes naturally to them (Tapscott, 2009).
Korby (2013) suggests
the problem might be more complex than just teen brains being impacted by
technology interruptions. Perhaps many students aren’t being challenged and engaged enough to stimulate their brains in
class. So, the result is kids who are looking for a welcome, exciting
distraction using a variety of technology tools simultaneously. As the article indicates, we should prefer
talking to our students when they are actually in the room. We want our
students to boldly take risks. They cannot do this if they are constantly using
technology and their ideas come anonymously across an electronic device.
References:
Cherry, K. (2019, March 16). The Cognitive and Productive
Costs of Multitasking. Retrieved from
https://www.verywellmind.com/multitasking-2795003
Korby, H. (2013, May 15). With Tech Tools, How Should
Teachers Tackle Multitasking In Class? Retrieved from https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/28719/with-tech-tools-how-should-teachers-tackle-multitasking-in-class
Stenger, M. (2013, December 01). How Technology-Based
Multitasking Impacts Learning. Retrieved from https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/other/how-technology-based-multitasking-impacts-learning
Tapscott, D. (2009). The eight net gen norms. In Grown up
digital (pp.75-96). Toronto, Ontario: McGraw-Hill.
Umoh, R. (2017, October 6). With Tech Tools, How Should
Teachers Tackle Multitasking In Class? Retrieved from https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/28719/with-tech-tools-how-should-teachers-tackle-multitasking-in-class
Wallace, K. (2015, November 03). Teens spend 9 hours a day
using media, report says. Retrieved from
https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/03/health/teens-tweens-media-screen-use-report/index.html
No comments:
Post a Comment