Showing posts with label EdTech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EdTech. Show all posts

Friday, June 14, 2019

Old Crow and Squawker: Tweetosphere

Our flapping around the Tweetosphere has continued (first installment) and after reviewing the Community of Inquiry model we realized that Twitter is a tool that supports professional learning in a community of educators.
Community of Practice
As an educator who finds value in Twitter, I embrace a social presence albeit a strangely distant personal one. Now being on Twitter for awhile and having met a few folks via conference has developed my confidence and I’ve now moved beyond the acquaintance phase with some.  I have twitter friends who we jokingly say we stroke each other’s Twe-ego and retweet and comment on each others tweets.  By using messages on Twitter I have chatted with a few people and we have built more of a camaraderie and we try to work together to engage together. Lisa is at the beginning of building social presence and following people in order to make some acquaintances. We’ve chatted about Tweetiquette in the Tweetosphere in order to build positive relationships.

I have a perfectly respectable reputation as a socially present, empathetic and functioning human. But the concept of social presence, in a digital medium, comes with a whole host of new meanings and social conventions. I find it fascinating to look at how we humans (okay, some humans) can so quickly adapt old ideas and mores so they are applicable to new environments and situations. That said, becoming Twitterate is very much like trying to fit into a new workplace or family - it can be stressful! Before heading to my first day as a teacher, thoughts like “will they like me”, “will I like them?” “do I look okay?”, “am I qualified?” ran through my mind. Perhaps beginning to eek out a social presence online is not quite the cognitive equivalent of starting a career in teaching, but I found myself asking the same sorts of questions and needing guidance on how to “be” in this new environment.

Pondering on what Twitter does for my gray matter, what kind of cognitive presence does it have that would support me as teacher librarian? Thus far, I have dabbled in a book club that was a group of librarians discussing @MaryannWolf ‘s book #ReaderComeHome which I really enjoyed since people shared opinions about the book and more importantly, in my mind, how they applied it to their practice. These ‘slow chats’ are effective since the pace isn’t ‘live’ and it gives people a chance to jump in when and where they want. Slow chats are an interesting phenomena on Twitter since they truly allow a community of practitioners to construct meaning together. Hatching into the tweetosphere has improved my practice.
In order for me to begin using Twitter as an aspect of cognitive presence in my own learning experience, my ability to “talk the talk” (or squawk the squawk) is imperative before I am able to take part in and take advantage of the many conversations. I have tried to Tweet a few times now, but more importantly, I am reading and following and being generally inspired! Mel, on the other hand, is leading the way and using Twitter to co-construct meaning with colleagues from around the world and in many different context and I watch from the branch...

As a Tweeter, I do not yet have enough of a following to be a leader, or more of a teacher presence, in the teacher librarian community. Although I do put out questions and try to stimulate conversation, it is still hit or miss for what my followers jump on board with. If I want my role to diversify, I will need to be more cognisant of my twitter participation.  
There’s always programs like Coetail - Certificate of Education and Information Literacy which is an online certificate program and one of it’s avenues of learning is Twitter.  It will be very interesting to see how Twitter continues to evolve and grow.


Rob Power @PowerLrn has an established teacher presence on Twitter. He makes tweeting a component of many of his courses in order to coach students to leap from the nest into the Tweetosphere.  His coaching has taken a couple of flight paths one asking students to  post discussion questions before their presentation and the other is to follow a class hashtag.

Twitter does have value, but you need to take some time to build a nest and share your voice before you see the results. We all have to begin somewhere, so jump into the bath and tweet!

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

You Want Me To Agree To What?

By Rachel Johnson

I would consider myself a big enthusiast of EdTech; I love finding new ways to incorporate technology into the curriculum in meaningful ways.  However, over the past year or so, I've become more aware of personal privacy and what it means when you check off that little box that says "I agree to the terms and conditions outlined here".  As the way we access information and use resources on the internet changes, we need to consider issues of personal privacy and what it means for ourselves and our students.


So what's the big deal about this anyway?


The rate at which technology and innovation is occurring is far outpacing the development of supporting policies and legislation (Davis, 2014).  Policy development takes time and requires an enormous amount of effort and debate.  Technology, on the other hand, is rapidly changing on a daily basis; policymakers just simply cannot keep up with this rapid evolution.  While technology has made the collection and use of personal information easier, it has also opened up the potential for abuse of this information; thus, we need to consider what information we are giving up in the first place!

How do we protect ourselves and our students?


1.  Create a dummy email account for student use.  

A lot of information is collected when you set up an email account; for example, gmail requires first and last name, birthdate and gender.  That's a lot of personal information just right there!  A generic account created through gmail can be used by all of the students in your classroom when you are using a new digital tool that requires a user to sign up via email to protect that personal information.

For example, this carbon foot calculator requires users to either login with facebook or input an email address.  It's a great example of an excellent digital tool that asks for too much personal information!  A generic email class account would allow you to still use the tool while protecting your students.

2.  Check the privacy policy.

Making sure you actually read the "fine print" before accepting the terms and conditions is crucial in understanding what personal information you are giving up and what is being done with this information.  Yes, I know that's painful but it's worth it in the long run!

Recently, Common Sense Education brought out a tool that evaluates the risk to the user; check out this tool here: https://privacy.commonsense.org/.  The neat thing about this tool is it evaluates it from a variety of perspectives to generate an overall evaluation score out of 100 (the higher the better) and recommendation for use.

3.  Communicate openly with parents.

At the beginning of the semester (or throughout the school year too), it is important to make parents aware and involve them in the choice of digital tools that is being used in the classroom.  This will give parents the opportunity to check out privacy policies for themselves and make an informed decision about whether it is safe for their child to participate or not.  Here is a sample letter that you can use.

4.  Incorporate digital citizenship into your classroom.

Finally, and most importantly, include digital citizenship wherever you can in your lessons and curriculum.  Common Sense Education has lots of resources to help with this or you can also check out this gamified Internet Awesome resource by Google.

These are only a few ways that you can protect yourself and your students.  What other ways do you keep yourself and your students safe?

References

Davis, K. (2014). Bridging the Innovation-Policy Gap. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 34(1), 87-92.