Showing posts with label professional development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label professional development. Show all posts

Friday, June 14, 2019

Old Crow and Squawker: Tweetosphere

Our flapping around the Tweetosphere has continued (first installment) and after reviewing the Community of Inquiry model we realized that Twitter is a tool that supports professional learning in a community of educators.
Community of Practice
As an educator who finds value in Twitter, I embrace a social presence albeit a strangely distant personal one. Now being on Twitter for awhile and having met a few folks via conference has developed my confidence and I’ve now moved beyond the acquaintance phase with some.  I have twitter friends who we jokingly say we stroke each other’s Twe-ego and retweet and comment on each others tweets.  By using messages on Twitter I have chatted with a few people and we have built more of a camaraderie and we try to work together to engage together. Lisa is at the beginning of building social presence and following people in order to make some acquaintances. We’ve chatted about Tweetiquette in the Tweetosphere in order to build positive relationships.

I have a perfectly respectable reputation as a socially present, empathetic and functioning human. But the concept of social presence, in a digital medium, comes with a whole host of new meanings and social conventions. I find it fascinating to look at how we humans (okay, some humans) can so quickly adapt old ideas and mores so they are applicable to new environments and situations. That said, becoming Twitterate is very much like trying to fit into a new workplace or family - it can be stressful! Before heading to my first day as a teacher, thoughts like “will they like me”, “will I like them?” “do I look okay?”, “am I qualified?” ran through my mind. Perhaps beginning to eek out a social presence online is not quite the cognitive equivalent of starting a career in teaching, but I found myself asking the same sorts of questions and needing guidance on how to “be” in this new environment.

Pondering on what Twitter does for my gray matter, what kind of cognitive presence does it have that would support me as teacher librarian? Thus far, I have dabbled in a book club that was a group of librarians discussing @MaryannWolf ‘s book #ReaderComeHome which I really enjoyed since people shared opinions about the book and more importantly, in my mind, how they applied it to their practice. These ‘slow chats’ are effective since the pace isn’t ‘live’ and it gives people a chance to jump in when and where they want. Slow chats are an interesting phenomena on Twitter since they truly allow a community of practitioners to construct meaning together. Hatching into the tweetosphere has improved my practice.
In order for me to begin using Twitter as an aspect of cognitive presence in my own learning experience, my ability to “talk the talk” (or squawk the squawk) is imperative before I am able to take part in and take advantage of the many conversations. I have tried to Tweet a few times now, but more importantly, I am reading and following and being generally inspired! Mel, on the other hand, is leading the way and using Twitter to co-construct meaning with colleagues from around the world and in many different context and I watch from the branch...

As a Tweeter, I do not yet have enough of a following to be a leader, or more of a teacher presence, in the teacher librarian community. Although I do put out questions and try to stimulate conversation, it is still hit or miss for what my followers jump on board with. If I want my role to diversify, I will need to be more cognisant of my twitter participation.  
There’s always programs like Coetail - Certificate of Education and Information Literacy which is an online certificate program and one of it’s avenues of learning is Twitter.  It will be very interesting to see how Twitter continues to evolve and grow.


Rob Power @PowerLrn has an established teacher presence on Twitter. He makes tweeting a component of many of his courses in order to coach students to leap from the nest into the Tweetosphere.  His coaching has taken a couple of flight paths one asking students to  post discussion questions before their presentation and the other is to follow a class hashtag.

Twitter does have value, but you need to take some time to build a nest and share your voice before you see the results. We all have to begin somewhere, so jump into the bath and tweet!

Saturday, May 25, 2019

An Old Crow Learns to Tweet from a Twitter Squawker: Cognitive Apprenticeship in Action

An Old Crow Learns to Tweet from a Twitter Squawker

Cognitive Apprenticeship in Action

So it happened! I, @botaklibrarian (botak means “bald” in Malay and was one of the first words I learned in Singapore) posted my first reply on Twitter. Not unexpectedly, the world spun on and very few people will notice -- but it happened and that’s HUGE for me.

A toe was immersed in the birdbath of tweeting as @botaklibrarian took encouragement from me, the @LOL1librarian. By no means am I an early adopter (Rogers, 1976), but as I attended various conferences like 21st Century Learning and other library conferences where people were tweeting the action and discussing their favourite people to follow like they were rockstars, a feeling of FOMO started to hatch. Soon I realized that colleagues around the world were sharing resources, ideas and the joy they encounter in their jobs. As @botaklibrarian and I sat down to explore, I worked to impart some of my FOMO vibe on the positives of Twitter.

Let’s call a bird a bird and disclose that I’m no spring chicken. As a teacher I thrive on the energy of collaboration and the creation of new, collective understanding, I love tech and learning, but I’m still on a daily schedule that evolved before the wonders of smartphones. My life seemed full and vibrant before the iPhone landed on the scene and I couldn’t figure out what was so important about a Tweet that I needed to find time, in an already full schedule, to devote to it. What more could I possibly put in my brain? What could I possibly have to say? How could I find room in my nest for yet another vehicle for communication? How would it be meaningful and not just another thing done cursorily and for appearances? Was I now all alone in my Tweet-free world?

I’ve read very elegant treatises on and listened to passionate humans discuss the world-changing effects of Twitter, but I remained wary of what I perceived as the inane, time-sucking, self-aggrandizing nature of the platform. It’s fair to say that I would have flown on in the small patch of sky I was comfortable with had I not been pulled, kicking and squawking, by another lovely bird (I am now done belabouring the bird metaphor).

As one of the passionate humans discussing Twitter, I realized that only shorts flights could be managed in order to engage this reluctant crow. In the past, @intlNadine and myself tried to model communication and collaboration strategies by tagging @botaklibrarian, however she ignored the notifications calling her name. The strategy to engage needed to change, and one catalyst for this change is the requirement to tweet and include the hashtag #EDUC5303G by @PowerLrn. Nothing like a little accountability to encourage the motivation.

That’s absolutely true! So buoyed by @LOL1librarian’s unflagging enthusiasm and kicked out of the nest by @PowerLrn, I opened my eyes and sat -- phone in hand and started asking a million stupid questions to my very patient mentor. At the same time (phones are amazing) I did some quick research and found excellent support for novices like this ‘cheat sheet” from Kathy Schrock. Still, there is a limit to what I can take in, so we’re starting with baby steps (or flaps..). One reply, no tweets yet and a very curated list of followees…

Similar to my own journey, I encouraged @botaklibrarian to keep the focus of Twitter on the professional side, she curated her list of following by looking for people who we had met at a library conferences, and are stars in the library realm. Our next step was to explore the hashtag #digitalcitizen that cropped up on a latest tweet in #EDUC5303G. Here is where we started discussing the power of the connection and how our professional learning can grow. By beginning to follow @istelib, the ISTE Librarians PLN we could see the amazing resources and ideas that they were tweeting out. Also, we chatted about how your connections and community can grow beyond your known faces by looking at the recommended list to follow connected to that profile.

And connect I did, well, not so much connect as observe. Our profession seems to have been able to master this tool to amazing advantage and I felt a little giddy with all the lightbulb moments happening as I traversed the Tweetosphere. This is Connectivism and @LOL1librarian is my cognitive coach. One of the first things we happened across was a tweet about a lesson on evaluating media (@KayOddone ) that was problem-based and connected to the real-world and was shaped in the Partnering model! There are still only 24 hours in a day but now I’m determined to find a few minutes each day for a quick flap.

And we will look at Kathy Schrock’s cheat sheet to say what branch on the path we should follow net. Stay tuned for our net installment!


References
Culatta, R., & Kearsley, G. (Eds.). (n.d.). Cognitive Apprenticeship. Retrieved
     May 23, 2019, from InstructionalDesign.org website 
     https://www.instructionaldesign.org/models/cognitive-apprenticeship/  

Miller, E. (2017, April 20). Teachers on Twitter: why you should join and how to 
     get started. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/ 
     teacher-network/2017/apr/20/teachers-on-twitter-why-join-get-started-social-media

Rogers, E.M. (1976). New product adoption and diffusion. Journal of Consumer 
Research, (March), 290 -301.

Schrock, K. (2019, March). Cure What Ails You: A Dose of Twitter for Every Day
     [Blog post]. Retrieved from Kathy Schrock's Guide to Everything website:
     https://www.schrockguide.net/twitter-for-teachers.html

Thursday, June 28, 2018

The Impact of AI on Higher Education: Time for a Revolution?


Is it time for higher education to find better ways to meet the needs of today’s learners? Joseph Aoun, President of Northeastern University, clearly thinks so. During an interview with MIT Technology Review (2018), Aoun discussed the impact of AI on higher education and outlined the urgent need for change in institutions of higher learning. Much of what he stated will not be new to most readers, but I recommend viewing the 29-minute video (at the link below) since the brief summary below hardly does the interview justice.  


Firstly, in terms of how the average, degree-seeking higher education student is educated, Aoun advised a greater emphasis on humanics (defined by Merriam Webster as “the subject or study of human nature or human affairs”), which he described as the interweaving of three literacies: tech literacy (the ability to grasp how machines function and how to interact with them effectively), data literacy (the ability to understand and navigate volumes of data generated by AI), and human literacy (the development of soft skills that cannot be duplicated by machines). Aoun also recommended a combination of real-world (experiential) and classroom education to teach learners to identify personal skill gaps, develop empathy, and better understand the world. 

Secondly, Aoun observed that many lifelong learners have ceased looking to universities for their professional development needs; they are turning to employers instead, and although some organizations are meeting this need, they are also questioning whether it will be worth it in the long run, given that most employees no longer remain with a company for extended periods. Other employers, seeing that their employees’ skills are already obsolete, are taking the initiative to provide training, but they’d prefer that higher education do this so that they can focus on business instead.

One solution, according to Aoun, is for higher education to offer customized, flexible options, consulting with learners to determine their desired outcomes, just as businesses do with their customers, rather than restricting options to degrees and research in a time when learners are already customizing their learning.  As long as institutions continue to restrict admission to their programs based on an established set of criteria, they are turning “customers” away, which no business in its right mind would do. This statement really hit close to home for me—as a lifelong learner who sought information on some courses offered by a local university only to be told that they were strictly for undergraduate students (despite there being a diploma option), I can identify with this. I felt exactly like a customer whose business was being turned away. Like others in this type of situation, I looked elsewhere and found the training I wanted for a reasonable fee at a small, private institution that offered flexible options.

Aoun also suggested that perhaps it’s time for the governments that fuel research and innovation and provide funding for education from Kindergarten to higher education, to consider offering incentives to individuals to encourage lifelong learning in ways that suit them best.

The labour market worldwide is quickly changing: new jobs are being created on an ongoing basis, and it won’t be long before many others become obsolete. A quick Internet search will yield possibly hundreds of results on the topic of job automation, with varying projections on the types and numbers of jobs at risk (Winick, 2018).  Although the news is not all doom and gloom (Lund & Manyika, 2017), Aoun asserted that institutions that fail to place a greater emphasis on lifelong learning are like the railway industry that saw the advent of the airlines but continued with business as usual, assuming that their jobs would not be impacted.
 
Advances in technology have made it necessary for higher education to rethink the options they offer to all types of learners, but according to Aoun, this is not an easy sell. Ironically, though, the same institutions that are hard at work teaching today’s educators to embrace the latest learning theories and adapt their teaching practices to give this generation of learners the skills needed for success in the 21st century, may find one day that their faculties of education have done their job all too well, as the current generation of students become autonomous learners with well-developed growth mindsets who are capable of customizing their own learning and have little or no need for the traditional options offered by institutions of higher learning.

References

Humanics. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/humanics

Lund, S. & Manyika, J. (2017, November). Five lessons from history on AI, automation, and employment [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-organizations-and-work/five-lessons-from-history-on-ai-automation-and-employment

MIT Technology Review (Producer). (2018). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence [Video webcast]. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/video/611313/robot-proof-higher-education-in-the-age-of-artificial-intelligence/

Winick, E. (2018, January 25). Every study we could find on what automation will do to jobs, in one chart. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610005/every-study-we-could-find-on-what-automation-will-do-to-jobs-in-one-chart/

Recommended Reading

Aoun, J. E. (2018). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. Education Technology Insights, February-March 2018, pp. 11-12. Retrieved from https://www.educationtechnologyinsights.com/magazines/February2018/LMS/